Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
This website also uses cookies that can’t be disabled through this tab and will need to be disabled manually. The blog itself uses a commenting system by wpDiscuz which uses a cookie to remember some of the information you put in to save you inputting it every time. It also helps prevent comment spam.
The blog may also feature embedded items such as youtube videos which can set cookies to identify your device and approximate location to optimize bandwith and tailor ads as handled by google.
Our Directory also sets some cookies for the Map to function based on your selection and preferences.
Unfortunately the scripts for these features cannot be placed here for you to disallow the cookies manually, therefore the button on this tab will have no affect.
However if you wish to disable these cookie, you will need to disallow them manually in your browser.
For Google Chrome – Please follow this guide and add this website to the cookie block list: https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/61416?co=GENIE.Platform%3DDesktop&hl=en
Firefox: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/enable-and-disable-cookies-website-preferences
Safari: https://support.apple.com/kb/ph21411?locale=en_US
If you need any support with this, or use a different browser you can contact us for advice.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
Seventy six is not old to die these days and perhaps he would have lived longer had he not cycled quite so enthusiastically. It’s a fine line between healthy exercise and overdoing it. Similarly, Steve Jobs would probably be alive today had he not put his faith in alternative medicine when he was diagnosed with cancer. As a New Age Buddhist convert, he came round to proper medicine in the end but it was too late. There are many premature deaths in Hollywood due to so-called health regimes, cod cures and quackery.
Are you being deliberately provocative, Richard, or is this the real unbelievably patronizing, prejudiced, pompous, overweening, arrogant, presumptuous, conceited, self-aggrandizing, egocentric you?
These people would still be alive if only they were as clever and wise and educated and intelligent and conventional as you?????
Go and tell that to their families and friends.
“If only, we can’t help thinking, his family had known about the Rev Paul Sinclair’s bicycle hearse.”
Precisely, Charles; and we can’t help thinking either, can we, if only his family’s chosen funeral director hadn’t been such an indolent layabout…
Ah, Jonathon, invective is one thing but as Grandgrind said ‘Facts,facts, facts’. Cycling is actually a great prophylactic against involvement with the dismal trades. This from the Cycling Touring Club’s research into its benefits:
People who cycle regularly in mid-adulthood typically enjoy a level of fitness equivalent to someone 10 years younger, and their life expectancy is two years above the average.
(The latter finding is also borne out by an unpublished analysis of CTC members’ obituaries).
A population-wide study in Copenhagen found that, compared with those who cycled regularly to work, people who did not do so had a 39% higher mortality rate, regardless of whether or not
they sometimes took part in other physical activities at other times.
Cycle commuting improves fitness in men and women and is inversely associated with body mass index (BMI – a measure of whether someone is a healthy weight for their height), obesity, triglyceride levels, blood pressure, and insulin level in men.
A Dutch study found that employees who cycle regularly to work are less frequently ill, with on average more than one day per year less absenteeism than colleagues who do not cycle to
work. The authors calculated that between them employers in the Netherlands could save around 27 million Euros in terms of absenteeism if they encouraged more people to cycle.
Over a period of nine years, a study of male civil servants found that those who cycled for at least an hour a week (or 25 miles in a single week) experienced less than half the non-fatal and
fatal coronary heart disease of the others.
Another UK study found that people who took up cycling as a new activity gained the greatest benefits at the outset, but fitness continued to improve as they increased their cycle use.
Reduced body fat was also noted, particularly among those who were overweight or obese at
the outset of the trial.
A study predicting the consequence of 100,000 people taking up regular cycle commuting calculated that 50 fewer deaths would result per year (health benefits and reduced road casualties aggregated), the equivalent of 1,660 life years.
So, all in all, cycle more, live well and live longer!
Jonathan, with all respect I think you over-reacted. It’s a fact cycling and other forms of exercise are good for you. It’s also a fact, we must slow down with age. I wasn’t trying to demonstrate how wise I am: I happen to lead an insufficiently healthy lifestyle and could well die before 76 as a result.
Richard, your initial comments are over-simplistic, self-observing, and sadly tarnish a rather beautiful account of a man’s natural death. A man who had, for whatever reason, reached his allotted span, which ended in a way which seems to have given his family a feeling of satisfying completion. Sometimes there is a lot to be said about keeping our opinions to ourselves, if only out of consideration and kindness to a bereaved family.
Vale, I’m in agreement with you about the life-enhancing benefits for cyclists. Apart from the proportion which are regularly squished by trucks, of course. They may have been better off staying down the pub.
I’ve always been a two wheels good four wheels bad sort of person Sweetpea. I dream of becoming the Cycling Celebrant – but distances do defeat you. Still I’m currently saving pennies from my miserly stipend to buy a real Dutch bike. I can really see myself, overcoat billowing, trundling up to the local Crem on one of those.
Interesting about Steve Jobs illness and death. He was rueful about his earlier commitment to alternative therapies to tackle his cancer. He knew he had shortened his own life. But, if you read about him, I think he accepted the choices he made as expressions of a very stubborn and distinctive approach to living. In. There is a very direct connection between the man who made Apple and the man who tried to find his own philosophically agreeable route to death. I don’t think he minded the failure in that sense. From all I’ve read about him it was the absolute commitment to right principles that mattered more than – in the end – success or failure.
Leaves me reflecting that the life we live shapes the death we find (or that finds us) in the end.
Sweetpea
I don’t precede every point I make with clarifications to pacify predictable angry responses. I could easily have preceded my brief observation with how I’m charmed by the cyclist and in awe of Job’s achievements; how I offer my condolences to their families; how they both had good innings, whether or not one over-exerted himself with exercise, and the other declined treatments that might have saved his life, etc etc. However, as you say, some things don’t need to be said: such padding would be verbose, too much about the writer rather than the thought being thrown out there. It’s really not a big deal but I stand by the thought I shared, whether a few disagree or not. Censorship for consensus or respectful debate? Jonathan’s response was surely a tad silly?
No, Richard, I’m not expecting to preface every comment you make with an all-inclusive round up, enlightening though that may be. Jonathan certainly expresses his thoughts in his own sweet manner, and that is what we love about him. And I am sure he is the very last person to want to stifle debate or to impose censorship.
However, to return to the point in hand, I am still at a loss to see what your comments added to this debate, both in taking pot-shots at the wisdom of Mr Mitchell’s excercise regime versus his general state of health (about which you have very little knowledge)and, even more bafflingly, at Mr Jobs’ medical decisions (which appear to be entirely unrelated to the discussion of a be’spoke’ cycling funeral).
Sweetpea, I see your point. I’m sorry, and regret the post.
It was a lovely turnout for sure, but I must confess as I look at my shape I’m rather relieved I never had to show up wearing bright blue and yellow lycra!