Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
This website also uses cookies that can’t be disabled through this tab and will need to be disabled manually. The blog itself uses a commenting system by wpDiscuz which uses a cookie to remember some of the information you put in to save you inputting it every time. It also helps prevent comment spam.
The blog may also feature embedded items such as youtube videos which can set cookies to identify your device and approximate location to optimize bandwith and tailor ads as handled by google.
Our Directory also sets some cookies for the Map to function based on your selection and preferences.
Unfortunately the scripts for these features cannot be placed here for you to disallow the cookies manually, therefore the button on this tab will have no affect.
However if you wish to disable these cookie, you will need to disallow them manually in your browser.
For Google Chrome – Please follow this guide and add this website to the cookie block list: https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/61416?co=GENIE.Platform%3DDesktop&hl=en
Firefox: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/enable-and-disable-cookies-website-preferences
Safari: https://support.apple.com/kb/ph21411?locale=en_US
If you need any support with this, or use a different browser you can contact us for advice.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
Hello Charles
yes, ‘the role of ‘the trade associations’ is solely to protect their members, ala ‘Funeralcare’ as the main offender, the consumers, well……………………….
regards
andrew
I wait with interest to see what this undercover investigation shows.
Producer – Ben Anderson
Is this the same Ben Anderson of the Dignity expose 15 years ago ?
Yes Tracey it is. From what I understand this documentary will make the previous Co-op exposé look like a promotional video.
No one should be thinking this is a good thing, the whole profession will suffer damage to its reputation, independents may want to be associated with exposed in their name on this programme. Those fuelling the fire of these programmes are not helping.
My thinking exactly, Simon. It sounds as if all it will accomplish is a call for the healing art of funeral management to be reduced to a regulated industry, with a prescribed procedure and with all the advantages that will confer on the wealthier group traders whose interest is consumeristic at heart. Let’s just hope that BBC 2’s idea of a funeral documentary, ‘Dead Good Job’ episode three, leaves a sweeter aroma when it ends; an hour and a half in the same evening before this Frankenstein’s monster pukes its bile into your living room. You can’t sweep darkness out… Read more »
Simon, Jonathan – I don’t believe that your assumptions are correct – far from being a call for regulation or a blight on the whole profession, Ben’s documentary is I believe a damning indictment of the lack of compliance with the NAFD Code of Conduct by two certain large businesses and an expose of the inefficient management therein that has allowed lax practices to flourish. Surely such a revelation is something that should be welcomed by anyone who wants to see an informed and wary public who asks intelligent questions of the person they trust with the care of their… Read more »
Fran, you write as though you have some knowledge of this programme. Do you know Ben?, do you and Charles have cameo roles ? The ITV listing just says that that there are some shocking scenes, it does not mention NAFD or any compliance stuff
Has Ben told you that only two companies are featured ? Which ones ? What else do you know ? come on, you’ve let it slip !
Tell us do !
I’ve not seen anything, Ken. My own view, which I have communicated to the production company, is that balance is important; if you’re going to frighten the pants off people without also showing them that, within ten miles of them, there is golden-hearted FD, you’re not doing consumers a service. By all means name and shame the guilty – it’s no more than they deserve. But it’s only fair also to name and acclaim the excellent, then draw the moral: be careful.
I find myself agreeing with Fran. If something needs fixing……
Simon, if deplorable practice is not to be exposed what is to be done about it? The funeral service trade bodies undertake to police the industry but fail to do so effectively. This failure permits conditions where poor practice can establish itself, creating ripe opportunities for investigative journalists to do what investigative journalists do in what they would claim is the public interest. If their work results in wrongs being righted, where is your objection? The public interest is served, yes? We can only applaud, surely? By what better means could this be achieved? You say that this programme is… Read more »
My experience of the bereaved is that such is their altered state of awareness in the immediate aftermath of the death of someone they love, they often walk into the first funeral director they can find and start planning the funeral. They assume this person will take consummate care of the deceased and also assume they will be treated fairly when it comes to pricing. Although I worry for the desolation that could be felt by grieving people seeing the truth of what can actually happen behind the scenes, I also welcome good documentary making that will hopefully make people… Read more »
I agree with you Carole — sadly. We live in a caveat emptor economy. As the referee tells boxers before they fight, ‘protect yourself at all times’. This being so, there would seem to be no other way. Simply, consumers must be aware of their responsibility to themselves and to the person who has died. It’s the way it is.
Funerals are a strange one though aren’t they, when it comes to consumer consciousness? Because of our death denying culture it is so often not something that people really think about until they have no choice, and at that point they are not thinking clearly and possibly don’t even recognize that they are a consumer at all?
Perhaps as well as “expose” type documentaries it would be helpful to have more clever film making that will attract attention around the wonderful diverse choices available when someone dies.
Of course, I am not suggestion for one movement that bad practice within the profession should not be addressed and certainly it should not be be allowed to to go unchallenged. I just do not believe that undercover filming is the way to expose it and address it. I tend to agree that the trade associations should do more. Many many good funeral directors either individuals or firms will be tarred with the very same bruch that will expose, I am guessing the activity in one or two funeral homes both corporate and independent. In fact if my info is… Read more »
Simon, I have read your contributions to this thing with interest and you do seem to make sense. As I have just said to Fran, I cant understand why she and others seem to want a fight ! Cant’ the Green and Environmental smaller guys just co exist alongside the Co-op/Dignity/without digging one another in the ribs ? It really is a bit petulant. I would really like to know how many contributors to this blog , who regularly criticise the Co-op , Dignity and other big firms, have ever worked for them ? My time with all of the… Read more »
The largest trade association appears totally unwilling to criticise the big two – perhaps because they provide a large percentage of their annual revenue? How can you regulate the very people who help pay your salary? The NAFD response to the Funeralcare expose seemed to be ‘but everyone in the industry does it that way.’ Light is best shone in dark places. I believe the public should to be better informed before choosing a funeral director. Anything that makes people more questioning of the organisation they are about to entrust with the funeral, has to be a good thing doesn’t… Read more »
I have yet to hear any response whatever from the NAFD on that matter, which is somewhat regrettable, given their position as self imposed arbiter of the “profession’s” standards.
Why the deafening silence?
Or have I missed the big bazooka yet again?
They have responded – in their monthly magazine. They said it was regrettable that this sensational programme was ever made. They say everything shown was standard practice and reflected a truth the public should not be forced to see. The programme reflected badly on all funeral directors. The minor issues in the branch (failing to sell a simple funeral when asked) were being addressed by re-training.
So that’s all right then. Business as usual.
I hope this ‘expose’ will raise the most important point of all, which is our need to change to a healthier perspective on death and dying and that we must start talking rather than running away from the fact that at some point we and those we love will die. Managing probate can be more stressful than loss itself! In talking before the event, people will realise they have a range of choices, at a time when they are able to make decisions that are not clouded by grief, which in itself will bring the disreputable providers to accountability. Sadly… Read more »
Perhaps what we need is a really good doc series about our culture’s attitudes towards the end of life, the fact of mortality. Not just nuts and bolts, (i.e FDs and crematoria) but discussions and interviews about different sorts of people dealing with the knowledge that only humans amongst animals have (as far as we know) that “my life will end.” That might water the roots of our engagement with undertakers and celebrants; a sort of televisual Death Cafe. It would not be about “breaking the taboo” as the tired slogan has it; that’s much easier – paint your coffin,… Read more »
I wonder if something good may work backwards from this sort of programme – get people talking and thinking about what it’s all about and how it ought to be.
I am with you totally Gloria, I have been campaigning for a change in attitudes, having also written books on it following my mother’s death last year. Our denial of our mortality causes the greatest pain, fear and dysfunction! The superficial acts and rituals we undertake may satisfy the mind and ego but they will not alter the fact of death, that the ego cannot accept.
I am hoping that this programme does not show deceased people on it because I find it of great disrespect to the person that has passed away. I think that the Media are forgetting that these are people’s loved ones. They are not bodies etc they are people and I shall wait to see what they show , but from what I have heard its not going to be all that good.
In response to Ken above – yes, I do know Ben and admire him greatly, his book ‘No Worse Enemy’ about his time embedded with troops in Afghanistan is compelling reading. No, neither Charles nor I have a cameo role in this latest documentary and yes, I do have some knowledge of the programme – the Natural Death Centre as an independent advice charity is the logical point of contact for any media looking at the UK funeral industry so we do tend to have our fingers on the pulse.
Thanks for your honesty Fran. I too have read the book yet wonder what have Mr Anderson’s experiences in Afghanistan to do with the disruption of funeral business in Britain unless it be simply a desire to witness conflict. Reading between the lines then, someone or something has encouraged Ben to reprise his role from the 1990s and your charity may have in some way pointed him towards a target or two ? At least that explains why your website is still carrying a “have you had a problem with a funeral director “? If so email Ben @ etc… Read more »
Ken, do you take the same view of cowboy builders? The impulse to get a fair deal for funeral shoppers is not the exclusive preoccupation of what you characterise as the green lobby. Here at the GFG we are non-denominational, and the NDC’s concerns about poor practice in the industry fall perfectly properly within its wider consumer advocacy remit. The GFG is not anti groups per se. We would back any enterprise that rolled out a good and trustworthy brand, which is why we have been glad to act as consultants for major retailer on how it might do exactly… Read more »
Actually, there is another raoesn besides funeral expenses if you develop a health condition at a later age and have had a policy since you were a kid you don’t have to worry about finding someone who will insure you when you are older.
..
Unfortunately the Corporate funeral Companies have adopted a policy of bringing in managers with no funeral experience. This works for a standard retail business but funerals are very specialised. The Corporates are only interested in management background and not funeral background. This thinking has a knock on affect with the standard of service delivered which is a result of a watered down version of training. Ask any operative, working for a Corporate,about the history of the profession and they would not know why they do what they do and the tradition behind it. You might ask the relevance, well you… Read more »
great stuff ‘JJ’ and said with an immense amount of feeling/passion etc
andrew
I think the Funeral Profession would be very difficult to regulate. If the industry was regulated with the same Code of Practice the NAFD enforce, would this have changed the content of this programme? The sheer disrespect for the deceased shown by the staff in this programme is something that no body or government could change without having constant monitoring. I do believe regulation would help in ensuring the consumer understands the costs and terms and conditions of the Funeral. I own and run a three branch operation in the West Midlands and am a proud member of the NAFD.… Read more »